eProcurement savings & ROI calculator

The calculator sets your process cost and your maverick buying against an investment.

All inputs and assumptions are yours. The pre-filled values are example values, not benchmarks.

Where do eProcurement savings come from?

eProcurement savings come from three sources: lower process cost per order, less maverick buying and agreed prices that reach every order through catalogs. The calculator below covers the first two with your own figures; the third depends on your negotiations and is not part of the model.

  • Process cost per order

    Every order runs through requisition, approval, ordering, goods receipt and invoice. When requesters order from catalogs, approvals follow rules and the order goes to the ERP automatically, fewer of these steps are done by hand.

  • Maverick buying

    Orders placed outside framework agreements and catalogs are usually bought at list price instead of the agreed price. If the catalog is the easiest way to order, more volume runs through your contracts.

  • Prices through catalogs

    Catalogs carry the prices of your framework agreements, so requesters order at contract prices without looking them up. Volume bundled with fewer suppliers strengthens your position in the next negotiation.

Benchmarks with source

The Hackett Group reports that digital transformation can reduce the process costs of typical procurement organisations by 30 percent, and that technology enables world-class procurement organisations to reduce their cost per order by more than 70 percent.

The Hackett Group, press release of 21 August 2018

These figures describe procurement organisations in general and are not a forecast for your project. Enter your own reduction rates in the calculator.

Inputs and assumptions

Your baseline figures

Figures from your procurement and controlling teams. The pre-filled values are examples.

Number of operational orders, excluding strategic large contracts.

Typical goods value of an indirect order.

Internal effort for requisition, approval, order, goods receipt and invoice.

Estimated share of order volume outside framework agreements and catalogs.

Average price premium on orders outside catalog and contract channels.

Your assumptions

Onveda does not prescribe reduction rates or an investment amount. Enter what you plan for your organisation.

The percentage by which you intend to reduce the process cost per order.

The share of the additional maverick cost you intend to avoid.

Licence, implementation and integration, operation and internal project effort in year one.

Result

The result is recalculated with every change.

Total savings per year
–
Payback
–

Calculation path

Calculation path with the origin of every figure
ItemValue
Process cost
Orders per monthYour input (example value)2,500
Process cost per orderYour input (example value)€85
Reduction of process costYour assumption–
Process cost savings per yearCalculated–
Maverick buying
Average order valueYour input (example value)€850
Maverick buying shareYour input (example value)25%
Maverick price premiumYour input (example value)12%
Additional cost from maverick buying per yearCalculated€765,000
Reduction of maverick buyingYour assumption–
Maverick buying savings per yearCalculated–
Total
Total savings per yearCalculated–
Investment in year oneYour assumption–
Net result in year oneCalculated–
PaybackCalculated–

The calculator is a calculation aid, not a quote and not a commitment. The result depends entirely on your inputs and assumptions.

How the calculator works

The model is kept simple so that your controlling team can verify it.

Process cost savings per year
Orders per month × 12 × process cost per order × reduction of process cost
Additional cost from maverick buying per year
Orders per month × 12 × average order value × maverick buying share × maverick price premium
Maverick buying savings per year
Additional cost from maverick buying × reduction of maverick buying
Total savings per year
Process cost savings + maverick buying savings
Net result in year one
Total savings per year − investment in year one
Payback in months
Investment in year one ÷ total savings per year × 12
Ariba costs over 5 years
Your annual Ariba costs × 5

What the model does not cover

  • Running costs after year one
  • The ramp-up of usage over time
  • Effects from better terms or demand bundling
  • Internal project effort, unless you include it in the investment

From assumption to cost framework

The investment in the calculator is your assumption. The figure for your project comes from a cost framework based on your modules, your integrations and your operating model.

Request a cost framework

Fields marked with * are required.

For example ERP systems, modules required, number of users and operating model.

Questions about eProcurement savings and ROI

eProcurement saves through lower process cost per order and less maverick buying, so the amount depends on your order volume, your current process cost and how consistently requesters use catalogs. As a benchmark, The Hackett Group reports up to 30 percent lower process costs for typical procurement organisations through digital transformation. The calculator above replaces the benchmark with your own figures.

Procurement ROI sets the yearly savings against the investment: process cost savings plus avoided maverick buying cost, minus the investment in year one. The calculator shows every step and the origin of each figure, so your controlling team can check it.

Payback in months is the investment in year one divided by the total yearly savings, multiplied by 12. The calculator assumes full usage from the first month, so the real payback comes later if adoption grows step by step.